Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicolas Ian Kotzen vs Unknown Player Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kotzen vs TBD analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolas Ian Kotzen vs Unknown Player Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kotzen 0 - 0 TBD
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kotzen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while TBD has won 41.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kotzen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while TBD has won 50.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kotzen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas TBD has saved 49.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kotzen has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 6/ 3), with TBD winning 24.59% (W/L 105/ 338) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kotzen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). TBD has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 39% (W/L 24/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 79/ 170).
- Player level: In the last year, Kotzen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/ 3), where as TBD has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 24.58% of matches (W/L 103/ 332). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kotzen has played against opponents with an average rank of 113.33 while TBD has played against players with an average rank of 34.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kotzen has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while TBD has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kotzen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and TBD has converted 39.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
67% (6-3)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Unknown Player
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicolas Ian Kotzen | Unknown Player |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 9% (43/415) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1388/2823) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 161 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 27.84 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (1751/2877) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (974/1751) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (434/1126) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (83/229) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (974/2745) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/207) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 17% (5/29) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 2% (1/42) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (19/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (19/19) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1% (190/1) |
Nicolas Ian Kotzen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
11
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Calvin Thalheimer
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Unknown Player
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
32 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
60
|
1-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pranav Kumar
Player
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Unknown Player Recent Matches Played
Before:
view more
Kotzen Vs TBD Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
